MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963564330 · doi:10.1159/000368981

Response to the Paper by Demirkol et al. Entitled ‘The Effect of Age on Right Ventricular Diastolic Function Parameters'

2014· letter· en· W1963564330 on OpenAlex
David Leibowitz, Dan Gilon, Jeremy M. Jacobs, Irit Stessman‐Lande, Jochanan Stessman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiastolic functionDiastoleCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineVentricular functionCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors would like to thank Demirkol et al. [1] for their thoughtful comments. We agree that echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular diastolic function has potential utility in many clinical scenarios including the effect of aging on cardiac and pulmonary function. Unfortunately, these parameters were not systemically examined in our study cohort [2]. We join with Demirkol et al. [1] in calling for future studies to assess the effect of aging on right ventricular diastolic function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it