Biosynthesis of oestrogen by the early equine embryo proper
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The embryo proper in early equine pregnancy has recently been shown to have a remarkable capacity for metabolism of oestrogens. High concentrations of oestrogens in yolk-sac fluid could provide substrate for local metabolism in tissues of the embryo proper and this activity could have significance for early development. Due to the high level of oestrogen metabolism in the embryo proper we examined the possibility that it could also biosynthesise oestrogens. Conceptuses were collected in the fourth week of pregnancy (n=23) and the embryo was separated from extraembryonic tissues for incubation with [(3)H]androstenedione. Steroids were recovered from media by solid-phase extraction and eluted as unconjugated and conjugated fractions. Profiles of free and sulfoconjugated fractions, as well as the phenolic steroids extracted from them, were obtained by chromatography. Oestrone and oestradiol were seen clearly, indicating oestrogen biosynthesis, and the presence of more polar products, arising from metabolism of the primary oestrogens, gave further evidence that the embryo was capable of oestrogen biosynthesis. Aromatase activity was also demonstrated by detection of tritium loss, as (3)H(2)O, from incubations (n=3) with [1β-(3)H]androstenedione. It is suggested that its oestrogen biosynthesis may have significance for the remarkable development of the vasculature in the embryo proper at this stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it