Biosynthesis of oestrogen by the early equine embryo proper
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The embryo proper in early equine pregnancy has recently been shown to have a remarkable capacity for metabolism of oestrogens. High concentrations of oestrogens in yolk-sac fluid could provide substrate for local metabolism in tissues of the embryo proper and this activity could have significance for early development. Due to the high level of oestrogen metabolism in the embryo proper we examined the possibility that it could also biosynthesise oestrogens. Conceptuses were collected in the fourth week of pregnancy (n=23) and the embryo was separated from extraembryonic tissues for incubation with [(3)H]androstenedione. Steroids were recovered from media by solid-phase extraction and eluted as unconjugated and conjugated fractions. Profiles of free and sulfoconjugated fractions, as well as the phenolic steroids extracted from them, were obtained by chromatography. Oestrone and oestradiol were seen clearly, indicating oestrogen biosynthesis, and the presence of more polar products, arising from metabolism of the primary oestrogens, gave further evidence that the embryo was capable of oestrogen biosynthesis. Aromatase activity was also demonstrated by detection of tritium loss, as (3)H(2)O, from incubations (n=3) with [1β-(3)H]androstenedione. It is suggested that its oestrogen biosynthesis may have significance for the remarkable development of the vasculature in the embryo proper at this stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".