Role of Asn<sup>2</sup> and Glu<sup>7</sup> residues in the oxidative folding and on the conformation of the <i>N</i>‐terminal loop of apamin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The X-ray structure of [N-acetyl]-apamin has been solved at 0.95 A resolution. It consists of an 1-7 N-terminal loop stabilized by an Asn-beta-turn motif (2-5 residues) and a helical structure spanning the 9-18 residues tightly linked together by two disulfide bonds. However, neither this accurate X-ray nor the available solution structures allowed us to rationally explain the unusual downfield shifts observed for the Asn(2) and Glu(7) amide signals upon Glu(7) carboxylic group ionization. Thus, apamin and its [N-acetyl], [Glu(7)Gln], [Glu(7)Asp], and [Asn(2)Abu] analogues and submitted to NMR structural studies as a function of pH. We first demonstrated that the Glu(7) carboxylate group is responsible for the large downfield shifts of the Asn(2) and Glu(7) amide signals. Then, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations suggested unexpected interactions between the carboxylate group and the Asn(2) and Glu(7) amide protons as well as the N-terminal alpha-amino group, through subtle conformational changes that do not alter the global fold of apamin. In addition, a structural study of the [Asn(2)Abu] analogue, revealed an essential role of Asn(2) in the beta-turn stability and the cis/trans isomerization of the Ala(5)-Pro(6) amide bond. Interestingly, this proline isomerization was shown to also depend on the ionization state of the Glu(7) carboxyl group. However, neither destabilization of the beta-turn nor proline isomerization drastically altered the helical structure that contains the residues essential for binding. Altogether, the Asn(2) and Glu(7) residues appeared essential for the N-terminal loop conformation and thus for the selective formation of the native disulfide bonds but not for the activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".