An investigation into bisphenol-A leaching from orthodontic materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively determine the bisphenol-A (BPA) leached from orthodontic materials during simulated intraoral exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples of orthodontic materials were subjected to simulated abrasion, immersion in artificial saliva, thermal shock via temperature cycling, and simulated intraoral exposure. Sample aliquots were collected for up to 2 weeks after artificial saliva immersion, derivatized, then analyzed for BPA by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. RESULTS: Quantifiable amounts of leached BPA were observed from a thermoformed orthodontic retainer material (7.63 µg/g of material) and an orthodontic adhesive (2.75 µg/g of material). BPA leaching was only observed within the first 3 days of artificial saliva immersion. CONCLUSIONS: Under the test conditions, BPA was observed to leach from two orthodontic materials. While the quantities of leached BPA were below the reference dose for daily intake, existing data of low-dose effects and medical disorders associated with elevated urinary BPA levels suggest that BPA exposure, and thus the use of the leaching materials identified in this study, should be reduced or eliminated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it