MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963661004 · doi:10.1139/f99-188

Identification of gender and reproductive maturity in the absence of gonads: muscle tissue levels of sex steroids and vitellogenin in gag (<i>Mycteroperca microlepis</i>)

2000· article· en· W1963661004 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Scott A. Heppell, Craig V. Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMicrosoft
KeywordsBiologyVitellogeninGrouperGonadPopulationEndocrinologyTestosterone (patch)Sexual maturitySex changeVitellogenesisDevelopment of the gonadsSexual differentiationInternal medicineZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryOocyteDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gag (Mycteroperca microlepis) are often landed eviscerated, so their gonads are not available for histological verification of gender and stage of maturity. Information on gender is particularly important for the management of hermaphroditic grouper, where increased mortality through fishing can directly affect sex ratio and therefore the reproductive capacity of the population. Alternative techniques for evaluating fish gender and maturity therefore need to be developed for gag and other grouper. We utilized sensitive immunoassays to measure levels of the sex steroids estradiol-17beta (E2), testosterone (T), and 11-ketotestosterone (11KT) and the egg-yolk precursor vitellogenin (VTG) in gag on a quarterly basis. Plasma and muscle levels of E2, T, and VTG in females were lowest during summer, rising in winter to reach peak values in spring. During winter and spring, plasma and muscle levels of 11KT were significantly higher in males than in adult females or immature fish. Combined measurement of VTG and 11KT in gag muscle proved useful for differentiating between males, adult females, and immature fish between December and April, the period of active gonadal recrudescence. This technique should prove useful in cases where fishery data are primarily collected through port sampling and gonads are not available for analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesFrench-language works237,207