Intermittent hypoxia during sleep induces reactive gliosis and limited neuronal death in rats: implications for sleep apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sleep apnea (SA) can be effectively managed in humans but it is recognized that when left untreated, SA causes long-lasting changes in neuronal circuitry in the brain. Recent neuroimaging studies gave suggested that these neuronal changes are also present even in patients successfully treated for the acute effects of SA. The cellular mechanisms that account for these changes are not certain but animal models of intermittent hypoxia (IH) during sleep have shown neuronal death and impairment in learning and memory. Reactive gliosis has a drastic effect on neuronal survival and circuitry and in this study we examined the neuro-glial response in brain areas affected by SA. Glial and neuronal alterations were analyzed after 1, 3, 5 and 10 days of exposure to IH (8 h/day during the sleep phase, cycles of 6 min each, 10-21% O2) and observed significant astroglial hyperplasia and hypertrophy in parietal brain cortex and hippocampus by studying gliofibrillary acidic protein, Vimentin, S100B and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression. In addition, altered morphology, reduced dendrite branching and caspase activation were observed in the CA-1 hippocampal and cortical (layers IV-V) pyramidal neurons at short exposure times (1-3 days). Surprisingly, longer exposure to IH reduced the neuronal death rate and increased neuronal branching in the presence of persistent reactive gliosis. Up-regulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1alpha) and mdr-1, a HIF-1alpha target gene, were observed and increased expression of receptor for advanced end glycated products and its binding partner S100B were also noted. Our results show that a low number of hypoxic cycles induce reactive gliosis and neuronal death whereas continuous exposure to IH cycles reduced the rate of neuronal death and induced neuronal branching on surviving neurons. We hypothesize that HIF-1alpha and S100B glial factor may improve neuronal survival under hypoxic conditions and propose that the death/survival/re-growth process observed here may underlie brain circuitry changes in humans with SA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".