MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>In vitro</i> characterization of calcium transport along the gastrointestinal tract of freshwater rainbow trout <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>

2012· article· en· W1963709822 on OpenAlexaff
Joel S. Klinck, Ajeet Pratap Singh, Chris M. Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGillRainbow troutCalciumMucusIon transporterGastrointestinal tractEpitheliumOsmoregulationTroutAnatomyBiochemistryInternal medicineMembraneEcologySalinity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using an in vitro gut-sac technique, this study examined the mechanisms of calcium (Ca) uptake along the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Ca uptake into three different compartments (mucous-bound, mucosal epithelium and blood space) of four distinct GIT segments (stomach, anterior intestine, mid intestine and posterior intestine) was monitored after luminal exposure to 10 mM Ca saline (radiolabelled with (45) Ca). Ca transport was determined to be both time-dependent and concentration-dependent. The concentration-dependent kinetics of Ca uptake was investigated using varying luminal concentrations of Ca (1, 10, 30, 60 and 100 mM). In the blood-space compartment, Ca uptake was saturable at high Ca concentrations in the mid intestine (suggesting mediated transport), while linear uptake was found in the other gut segments. In the mucous-bound and mucosal epithelium compartments, however, saturation kinetics were found for most GIT segments, also suggesting mediated transport. Manipulation of serosal saline osmotic pressure with mannitol demonstrated that Ca uptake was not greatly affected by solvent drag. Elevated mucosal cadmium (Cd) did not appear to inhibit Ca uptake into the blood space in any of the GIT sections, and Ca uptake did not appear to be sodium dependent. Maximum transport capacities for Ca and Cd were found to be comparable between the gills and gut, but affinities were much higher at the gills (up to 3000 times).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyFrench-language works237,207