MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963724452 · doi:10.3109/02713683.2013.770038

Is Pycnogenol a Double-edged Sword? Cataractogenic<i>In Vitro</i>, but Reduces Cataract Risk in Diabetic Rats

2013· article· en· W1963724452 on OpenAlexaff
John R. Trevithick, Vladimir Bantseev, Maurice Hirst, Tomasz M. Dzialoszynski, Ernest S. Sanford

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Eye Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntioxidantIn vivoIncubationChemistryOxidative stressBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Pycnogenol was used (a) to study its antioxidant activity, (b) to study its effects on lens integrity in organ culture and (c) in vivo to determine whether it could reduce the damage in model diabetic cataract. METHODS: For (a) our luminescent antioxidant assay was used, (b) lenses were incubated in medium 199, with 55.6 mM glucose. Lenses were stained with 0.014 mM rhodamine 123 for 15 min to stain mitochondria, immobilized in 1% agarose in M199, and the equatorial region examined by a Zeiss confocal microscope. For (c) cataract grades of streptozotocin diabetic rats fed 1% pycnogenol were followed for 12 weeks. RESULTS: (a) Pycnogenol in vitro was an antioxidant when challenged with peroxide. (b) In vitro, when [570 mg/L] pycnogenol in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used, lenses turned opaque after 3 d of incubation, in both pycnogenol controls and glucose + pycnogenol. Normal controls (DMSO, n = 4) and controls (n = 4) remained clear after 8 d of incubation. After 3 d of incubation with pycnogenol, cumulative protein leakage was greater than 0.28 mg/mL versus 8 d controls (0.018 mg/mL). Similar damage occurred at pycnogenol concentrations as low as 20 mg/L. The 20 mg/L pycnogenol control showed mitochondrial death, and calcium concentration in the lens equatorial differentiating fiber cells increased. (c) In vivo feeding pycnogenol resulted in similar growth and body condition for diabetic rats, and lower cataract grades at 9 and 11 weeks: final serum glucose levels were not significantly different, but glycohemoglobin A1 levels were significantly lower (83.9% of normal, p < 0.05) in pycnogenol-fed diabetic rats. CONCLUSIONS: Although it appears that pycnogenol has a potential toxic effect on incubated lenses, it appears in vivo to have a marginal protective effect, and also significantly reduces glycation of proteins. Supported by Cognis US (formerly Henkel Chemical Co.) and Horphag Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Eye ResearchSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207