MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963728409 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450800607

Interrelations between Rheology and Phase Behaviour in Partially Miscible Blends: The Case of Polydimethylsiloxane/Polyethylmethylsiloxane (PDMS/PEMS)

2002· article· en· W1963728409 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Divya Chopra, Marianna Kontopoulou, Dimitris Vlassopoulos, Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpper critical solution temperatureMiscibilityPolydimethylsiloxaneMaterials scienceRheologyPhase diagramDispersityViscoelasticityPhase (matter)Chemical engineeringPolymer chemistryThermodynamicsComposite materialLower critical solution temperaturePolymerCopolymerChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A rheological study of the phase behaviour and the dynamics in the immiscible region of a model partially miscible Upper Critical Solution Temperature (UCST) blend was carried out by using a series of nearly monodisperse polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) of varying molecular weights blended with polyethylmethylsiloxane (PEMS). The complete phase diagram was established through steady shear rheology, optical microscopy and light scattering. The UCST, interfacial tension and morphology of these blends are very sensitive to the molecular weight of the constituents. Partial miscibility was observed only when the Mw of PDMS was sufficiently low. The viscoelastic behaviour in the phase separated region can be modeled successfully using the Palierne model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207