Double-strand DNA Break Formation Mediated by Flap Endonuclease-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Double-strand DNA breaks are the most lethal type of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiations. Previously, we reported that double-strand DNA breaks can be enzymatically produced from two DNA damages located on opposite DNA strands 18 or 30 base pairs apart in a cell-free double-strand DNA break formation assay (Vispé, S., and Satoh, M. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 27386-27392). In the assay that we developed, these two DNA damages are converted into single-strand interruptions by enzymes involved in base excision repair. We showed that these single-strand interruptions are converted into double-strand DNA breaks; however, it was not due to spontaneous denaturation of DNA. Thus, we proposed a model in which DNA polymerase delta/epsilon, by producing repair patches at single-strand interruptions, collide, resulting in double-strand DNA break formation. We tested the model and investigated whether other enzymes/factors are involved in double-strand DNA break formation. Here we report that, instead of DNA polymerase delta/epsilon, flap endonuclease-1 (FEN-1), an enzyme involved in base excision repair, is responsible for the formation of double-strand DNA break in the assay. Furthermore, by transfecting a flap endonuclease-1 expression construct into cells, thus altering their flap endonuclease-1 content, we found an increased number of double-strand DNA breaks after gamma-ray irradiation of these cells. These results suggest that flap endonuclease-1 acts as a double-strand DNA break formation factor. Because FEN-1 is an essential enzyme that plays its roles in DNA repair and DNA replication, DSBs may be produced in cells as by-products of the activity of FEN-1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".