MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963733723 · doi:10.1109/isspit.2007.4458056

Combined Data Partitioning and FMO in Distortion Modeling for Video Trace Generation with Lossy Network Parameters

2007· article· en· W1963733723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLossy compressionTRACE (psycholinguistics)Distortion (music)Video qualityNetwork packetParametric modelReal-time computingChannel (broadcasting)Parametric statisticsAlgorithmData miningComputer networkArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMetric (unit)Bandwidth (computing)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of fourth generation wireless networks poses great challenges in video transport. Two of these prominent challenges are: a) providing and maintaining visually acceptable video quality given variations in channel conditions and b) the accurate measurement of this quality in network simulators using standard verbose trace flies. To address these challenges, in this paper, we propose and analyze an end-to-end (E2E) model for mean packet loss probability of H.264/AVC-based data partitioning (DP) substreams. The model we're presenting is based on the extended Gilbert model. We then incorporate the parametric formulation in our proposed base layer trace format that records E2E distortion coefficients for DP streams on a per slice level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it