Transforming Electromagnetics Using Metamaterials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electromagnetic metamaterials are artificially structured media with unusual electromagnetic properties that can be engineered from the radio-frequency (RF) and microwave range all the way up to optical frequencies. In its present form, the field of metamaterials is just over ten years old but has already attracted intense interest from many research groups around the globe. Suddenly, classical electromagnetism took on a fresh and exciting perspective, revealing that there are fascinating phenomena still waiting to be discovered and corresponding applications to be invented. In particular, all this excitement is associated with the notion of the macroscopic constitutive parameters, such as the permittivity and permeability. What would be possible if we were able to synthesize electromagnetic materials with arbitrarily valued constitutive parameters? The richness of this possibility becomes more evident when we recall that material parameters can be anisotropic (varying with direction) or spatially inhomogeneous (varying from point to point). Moreover, they can attain values previously not considered (i.e., negative or close to zero), and they can even mix together the electric and magnetic response of a material (chirality).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it