MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963763297 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5626222

MRI visualization of a single 15 µm navigable imaging agent and future microrobot

2010· article· en· W1963763297 on OpenAlexaff
Nina Olamaei, Farida Chériet, G. Beaudoin, Sylvain Martel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Notre-DamePolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtifact (error)Magnetic resonance imagingGradient echoVisualizationBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceMicrosphereMicroparticleImage resolutionClinical imagingNuclear magnetic resonanceRadiologyComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligencePhysicsOpticsMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the susceptibility-based contrast provides a way to amplify the effects of a magnetic microparticle, whereas its volume is largely inferior to the spatial resolution of the system. This concept presents an approach to visualization by means of susceptibility artifact using ferromagnetic microparticles. In this work, the amount of the susceptibility artifact was investigated using a simulation model and in vitro experiments on stainless steel microspheres measuring 40, 20 and 15 microm in diameter. The results showed that using a clinical MRI system, a single 15 microm microsphere is detectable in gradient-echo scans. The extent of the susceptibility artifact was found to be related to the scan parameters and the particles' sizes. Since the same ferromagnetic microparticle can be used for MRI-based propulsion, these results suggest several potential applications for navigable agents and microrobots involved in therapy, diagnostics, and imaging inside the microvascular network of the human body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207