Le rôle changeant des dirigeants du réseau canadien de la santé: <i>résultat d'un sondage national</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Afin d'établir la façon dont les dirigeants du réseau canadien de la santé réagissent à une décennie marquée par la régionalisation, les fusions d'hôpitaux et d'autres transformations du système de santé, un sondage national a été mené de janvier à mai 2000. Le sondage abordait un vaste éventail de sujets y compris les tendances qui entraînent une telle mutation, la préparation de carrière nécessaire pour affronter ces tendances, les qualités de chef qui sont gages d'efficacité et les évolutions des fonctions typiques d'un directeur de services de santé telles qu'il ou qu'elle les perçoit. Les résultats du sondage contribuent de manière significative au dialogue national sur la promotion du leadership et la planification de la relève dans les organismes de la santé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".