MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963816788 · doi:10.1159/000187138

Effect of Phosphatidylcholine on the Function of Human Mesothelial Cells in vitro

2008· article· en· W1963816788 on OpenAlexaff
Andrzej Bręborowicz, Janusz Witowski, J Knapowski, Kenneth D. Serkes, Leo Martis, Dimitrios G. Oreopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesothelial CellPhosphatidylcholineIn vitroMesotheliumCytosolLactate dehydrogenaseMedicineUltrafiltration (renal)Cytotoxic T cellBiochemistryMembraneCell biologyMolecular biologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyPhospholipidPathologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We tested the hypothesis that phosphatidylcholine (PC) molecules present in the dialysis solution may interact with the mesothelial cell membrane and modify its function. In vitro experiments were performed on human mesothelial cells (HMC) in culture. PC decreased proliferation of HMC when used at concentrations of 200 mg/l and higher. PC was also cytotoxic to HMC as measured by the release of lactate dehydrogenase from their cytosol. Cells exposed to PC had a diminished capacity for taking up 86Rb from medium. PC decreased the fibrinolytic properties of HMC and increased their procoagulant activity. Our results suggest that the positive short-term effect of the addition of PC to the dialysis solution (i.e., an increase in ultrafiltration) may be over-shadowed by its deleterious action on HMC membrane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicBiomedical Research and PathophysiologyFrench-language works237,207