MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963839550 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2012.0037

Poetry, Pictures, and Popular Publishing: The Illustrated Gift Book and Victorian Visual Culture, 1855–1875 (review)

2012· article· en· W1963839550 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Melissa Elston

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryMiddlebrowVisual culturePopular culturePublishingArtLiteraturePopularityArt historyHistoryVisual artsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Poetry, Pictures, and Popular Publishing: The Illustrated Gift Book and Victorian Visual Culture, 1855–1875 M. Melissa Elston (bio) Lorraine Janzen Kooistra, Poetry, Pictures, and Popular Publishing: The Illustrated Gift Book and Victorian Visual Culture, 1855–1875 (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2011), pp. xiv + 312, 68 illus., $59.95 hardcover. Scholars with an interest in Victorian visual and material culture as well as the history of the book will want to examine Lorraine Janzen Kooistra’s latest illustrated monograph, which reconstructs the gift-book industry’s oft-neglected significance to both middlebrow consumer culture and the high Victorian literary scene. During the 1860s, at the height of the gift book’s popularity, the books themselves—gilded, ornate, and produced in limited quantities (particularly around Christmastime)—were materially designed to communicate their cultural worth to middle-class consumers eager for “cultivation.” They also provided a visually oriented multimedia vehicle which, Janzen Kooistra observes, hastened the modernist decoupling of author from text, as illustrators took increasing interpretive liberties with the images they produced to accompany a given set of verses. For instance, she suggests that Tennyson’s well-known ire with illustrated editions of his work was not produced solely by the illustrations themselves but rather by his reduced power over his words and public image due to corporate authorship and production under emerging mass-market conditions. Indeed, Janzen Kooistra writes with formidable insight into the vast, intermingled range of other influences—artists, engravers, businessmen, [End Page 498] and consumers—upon 1860s gift-book production. A good portion of chapter 2 is devoted to the aesthetic and discursive shifts wrought by Pre-Raphaelite illustrative techniques, and chapter 3 elucidates the scope of the Dalziel engraving firm’s sway over popular publishing. She also scrutinizes the gendered dimensions of an artifact that was designed for interior domestic spaces rather than the “pocket of the moving man of the public sphere” (44). In fact, one of this study’s notable strengths is its careful attention to the tensions between the progressive ideological commitments of certain popular female poets (Eliza Cook, Jean Ingelow, and Adelaide Anne Procter), all of whom were featured in gift-book collections, and the traditionalist social messages implicitly attached to the spaces in which gift books were displayed. Certainly these women enjoyed a degree of national, even transnational, success that was buoyed by a marriage of modern marketing techniques to the popular appeal of “poetry at home” (128). Yet “whereas the prestige of a guinea gift book may have elevated the poetic stature of Cook, Procter, and Ingelow in their own day, it had the opposite effect” on Tennyson, Janzen Kooistra writes, a contrast which underscores the heavy gender-coding inherent to the dichotomy between popular consumer culture and “high art,” guineas and pounds aside (177). Toward the end of the book, in chapter 5, she notes Tennyson’s involvement in the release of a re-masculinized Cabinet Edition of his work (1874–75), which exchanged the gift-book aesthetics of the previous decade’s editions for a portable size and “workingman’s” feel— an attempt, perhaps, to disassociate from the feminized tabletop artifact and reclaim some of the poet’s perceived “lost” literary eminence (247). In some cases, the reduced sizes of some graphic reproductions within the pages of Poetry, Pictures, and Popular Publishing may be potentially frustrating to a visually oriented scholar. Nevertheless, the book’s many illustrations sustain and amplify its arguments, particularly during the second and fourth chapters. Overall, with its carefully executed analyses of nineteenth-century marketing strategies, publishing technologies, and the shifting nuances of public demand, Poetry, Pictures, and Popular Publishing does much to recapture the dual importance of the gift book as commercial and cultural object. It stands as a well-suited companion to Janzen Kooistra’s previous book-length studies of Victorian poetry, visual culture, and publishing history. [End Page 499] M. Melissa Elston Texas A&M University M. Melissa Elston M. Melissa Elston is a doctoral student at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas, who specializes in rhetoric and visual culture. Her previous publications have explored the historical relationships between nineteenth- and twentieth-century literature and European art...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207