MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dorsal raphe stimulation differentially modulates dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra

2000· article· en· W1963842767 on OpenAlexafffund
Julie Gervais, Claude Rouillard

Bibliographic record

VenueSynapse · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVentral tegmental areaSubstantia nigraNeuroscienceDorsal raphe nucleusDopaminergicDeep brain stimulationRaphe nucleiTegmentumStimulationMidbrainPars compactaDopamineBiologyPsychologyParkinson's diseaseMedicineSerotonergicCentral nervous systemInternal medicineSerotonin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The serotoninergic (5-HT) input from the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) to midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons is one of the most prominent. In this study, using standard extracellular single cell recording techniques we investigated the effects of electrical stimulation of the DRN on the spontaneous activity of substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) DA neurons in anesthetized rats. Poststimulus time histograms (PSTH) revealed two different types of response in both SNpc and VTA. Some cells exhibited an inhibition-excitation response while in other DA neurons the initial response was an excitation followed by an inhibition. In SNpc, 56% of the DA cells recorded were initially inhibited and 31% of the DA cells were initially excited. In contrast, 63% of VTA DA cells were initially excited and 34% were initially inhibited. Depletion of endogenous 5-HT by the neurotoxin, 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT), and the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor para-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA), almost completely eliminated the inhibition-excitation response in both SNpc and VTA DA cells, without changing the percentage of DA cells initially excited. Consequently, the proportion of DA neurons that were not affected by DR stimulation increased after 5-HT depletion (from 13% to 60% in SNpc and from 6% to 31% in VTA). In several DA cells, DRN stimulation caused important changes in firing rate and firing pattern. These data strongly suggest that the 5-HT input from the DRN is mainly inhibitory. It also suggests that 5-HT afferences modulate SNpc and VTA DA neurons in an opposite manner. Our results also suggest that non-5-HT inputs from DR can also modulate mesencephalic DA neurons. A differential modulation of VTA and SNpc DA neurons by 5-HT afferences from the DRN could have important implications for the development of drugs to treat schizophrenia or other neurologic and psychiatric diseases in which DA neurons are involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynapseSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207