MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963863611 · doi:10.1109/tc.2012.22

Low-Complexity Multiplier Architectures for Single and Hybrid-Double Multiplications in Gaussian Normal Bases

2012· article· en· W1963863611 on OpenAlexafffund
Reza Azarderakhsh, Arash Reyhani-Masoleh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsExponentiationModular exponentiationComputer scienceMultiplier (economics)Multiplication algorithmCryptographyCryptosystemMultiplication (music)ArithmeticFinite fieldParallel computingPublic-key cryptographyAlgorithmEncryptionMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsBinary number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extensive rise in the number of resource constrained wireless devices and the needs for secure communications with the servers imply fast and efficient cryptographic computations for both parties. Efficient hardware implementation of arithmetic operations over finite field using Gaussian normal basis is attractive for public key cryptography as it provides free squarings. In this paper, we first present two low-complexity digit-level multiplier architectures. It is shown that the proposed multipliers outperform the existing Gaussian normal basis (GNB) multiplier structures available in the literature. Then, for the first time, using these two architectures, we propose a new digit-level hybrid multiplier which performs two successive multiplications with the same latency as the one for one multiplication. We have studied the efficiency of the proposed hybrid architecture in terms of area and time delay for different digit sizes. The main advantage of this new hybrid architecture is to speed up exponentiation and point multiplication whenever double-multiplication is required and the traditional schemes fail due to the data dependencies. We have investigated the applicability of the proposed hybrid structure to reduce the latency of exponentiation-based cryptosystems. Our analysis and timing results show that the expected acceleration in double-exponentiation is considerable. Prototypes of the presented low-complexity multiplier architectures and the proposed hybrid architecture are implemented and experimental results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ComputersSame topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207