MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963883388 · doi:10.5737/1181912x16299103

Redefining the primary nurse role in oncology care: A 21st century perspective

2006· article· en· W1963883388 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sandra McFarlane, Cathy Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Oncology Nursing Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer CentreToronto East General HospitalHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncology nursingNursingSpecialtyMedicinePrimary carePerspective (graphical)Nursing practiceProject planPrimary nursingPlan (archaeology)Nurse educationFamily medicineManagementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oncology nursing is a rapidly evolving specialty with increasing demands upon nurses to respond to the complex needs of cancer patients and their families. Primary nursing (PN) has been the model of care delivery utilized at our cancer centre for more than two decades. The nursing department determined it was time that a review and redefining of the role be undertaken. These objectives were achieved through the implementation of the Primary Nurse Role Development Project. This article discusses: a brief background of why the existing role needed to be reviewed and revised; an overview of how primary nursing has been applied historically at the centre; and details regarding the project plan and its implementation. Results from the project provided a competency-based oncology primary nurse role description, which will be outlined along with proposals for improving nursing practice. Our goal is to achieve optimal care for our patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Oncology Nursing JournalSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207