Petroleum infiltration of high‐grade basement, South Norway: Pressure‐Temperature‐time‐composition (<i>P–T–t–X</i>) constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fluid inclusion data provide pressure–temperature–time–composition (P–T–t–X) constraints for an episode of petroleum infiltration of the crystalline basement in South Norway. Petroleum inclusions associated with pyrobitumen occur in postmetamorphic quartz veins in the Modum Complex. Three groups of fluid compositions have been shown, ranging from CH4 ± CO2 to condensates with alkanes up to C15. The range in fluid composition is a result of petroleum decomposition at high temperature. Globular and massive pyrobitumen occurs in the quartz veins or in associated vein systems. Reflectance (%Rm) measurements of 3.20–3.35 correspond to a maximum temperature of 207–214°C for the pyrobitumen associated with group II and III inclusions. Geothermometry of chlorites included in the quartz show results of 226–231°C. Pressure conditions of trapping for all three groups of inclusion fluids have been estimated to 520–985 bar at 220°C. The pressure range is probably a result of fluctuations caused by repeated fracture opening and sealing due to seismic activity coupled with mineral growth. A lack of systematic textural relationships between the three groups of inclusions and similar pressure–temperature estimates for all fluid types indicate trapping at similar times and a process of rapid change. Fluid migration in fractures from an overlying, overpressured sedimentary basin into a dry, crystalline basement best explains the observed P–T–t–X constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".