MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963889535 · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7513.362

Combing and combating head lice

2005· letter· en· W1963889535 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Dawes

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2005
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatological diseases and infestations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLousePanacea (medicine)Head (geology)CombingToxicologyZoologyBiologyMedicineGeographyCartographyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although large advances in dealing with heart disease may come in the future from gene therapy and stem cell research, it will still be important to determine beyond question whether antibiotic therapy can or cannot reduce C pneumoniae carriage by peripheral blood mononuclear cells.A finding that carriage can be greatly reduced or abolished significantly would provide a logical basis for trials of antibiotic treatment, not in patients with myocardial infarcts, but in young people without well established atherosclerosis.Of course, vaccination of the young against C pneumoniae, although hard to contemplate at the moment, is another avenue that could be taken.Such kinds of research will undoubtedly prove difficult but without implementation, the role, if any, of C pneumoniae in cardiovascular disease will remain shrouded in mystery for many years to come.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicDermatological diseases and infestationsFrench-language works237,207