MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963891047 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1409

Urinary Tract Infection in a Preterm Neonate Caused by Lactococcus lactis

2014· article· en· W1963891047 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Brandi Newby, Kuppuchipalayam K Ramesh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacteremiaMedicineSeptic arthritisEndocarditisMeningitisUrinary systemBrain abscessLactococcusSpondylodiscitisSepsisPneumoniaLactococcus lactisOsteomyelitisPeritonitisAbscessSurgeryInternal medicineAntibioticsArthritisMicrobiologyBacteriaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacteria of the genus Lactococcus are commonly used in manufacturing dairy products.1This genus of bacteria is also being investigated for use in the biotechnology industry, as a delivery system for vaccines and other therapies.1 It is rarely considered pathogenic in humans, although several cases of clinically significant Lactococcus infection have been reported. In adults, these infections have included endocarditis, liver abscess, peritonitis, pneumonitis, spondylodiscitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, sepsis, deep neck infection, and brain abscess.2-4 Among pediatric patients, a few cases have been reported, including brain abscess in a 19-month-old child,4 catheter-related bacteremia in a 9-month-old infant,5 and meningitis and septicemia in a 16-day-old neonate.3 This article describes a preterm neonate who experienced a urinary tract infection caused by Lactococcus lactis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207