MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assimilating Observation Data into Hydrological Model with Ensemble Kalman Filter

2011· article· en· W1963896452 on OpenAlexaff
Xiong Jun, Xiao Lan Huang, Zeng Yan Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnsemble Kalman filterKalman filterData assimilationStreamflowState variableA priori and a posterioriInversion (geology)Computer scienceExtended Kalman filterEnvironmental scienceMathematicsMeteorologyDrainage basinGeologyArtificial intelligenceGeographyStructural basinGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) is employed to simulate of streamflow of a slope sub-catchment during the rainfall infiltration process. With this method the whole process is treated as a dynamic stochastic system, and its streamflow is taken as the variable to describe the state of system. Furthermore, it is coupled with a hydrology model to cope with system uncertainty. Thus, the dynamical estimation of hydrological parameters is performed; the model variables and their uncertainty are obtained simultaneously. Numerical examples show that this strategy can effectively deal with observation noises and can provide the inversion results and the posteriori distribution of the priori information together. Compared with the conventional optimization algorithm, the new strategy combined with EnKF shows better character of real time response and model reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207