MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963914513 · doi:10.1063/1.1699108

A new method of modeling the conditional scalar dissipation rate

2004· article· en· W1963914513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsPhysicsScalar (mathematics)Statistical physicsDirect numerical simulationTurbulenceDissipationProbability density functionComputational fluid dynamicsConvection–diffusion equationScalar fieldMechanicsClassical mechanicsApplied mathematicsThermodynamicsStatisticsMathematicsReynolds numberGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for calculating the conditional scalar dissipation rate 〈N|η〉 is derived from the probability density function (pdf) transport equation for the conserved scalar Z. Two different formulations are obtained. One is the result of direct integration of the pdf transport equation and the second is further developed assuming a two-parameter presumed form for the pdf. A linear model is used for the conditional velocity. The model is compared with a direct numerical simulation (DNS) of inhomogeneous turbulent mixing. The results are in very good agreement with the DNS and perform better than Girimaji’s model which is based on homogeneous flow properties. Further validation with some experimental data would be useful. The new method has also the potential of being easily implemented in a finite-volume computational fluid dynamics code.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it