MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963972536 · doi:10.1115/pvp2007-26201

Modeling and Simulation of Conical Bending With Cylindrical Rolls

2007· article· en· W1963972536 on OpenAlexaff
Zhengkun Feng, Henri Champliaud, Thiên-My Dao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConical surfaceBendingFinite element methodMaterials scienceLigand cone angleStructural engineeringProcess (computing)Mechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conical roll bending with noncompatible conical rolls is less expensive than that with compatible conical rolls. However, the process still can not adapt to all desired cone radii and the manufacturing of such rolls is more expensive than that of cylindrical rolls. This paper presents the modeling of conical roll bending with cylindrical rolls, in which the sliding of the rolls over the plate section is allowed. Investigations of the influence of the sliding on the bending quality are carried out. Numerical simulations based on finite element method are performed with commercial software ANSYS LS-DYNA. The results agree well with those obtained with noncompatible and compatible conical rolls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207