Crustal models of the eastern Superior Province, Quebec, derived from new gravity data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New gravity data were collected in the Nemiscau and La Grande subprovinces of the Superior Province. This ~350 km gravity profile follows the Matagami-Radisson road and extends northward the gravity transect along the ~260 km long Lithoprobe seismic line 48, across the northern Abitibi and Opatica subprovinces. For the Abitibi-Opatica segment, the interpretation is consistent with the Lithoprobe seismic profile. It calls for crustal thickening near the boundary between the Abitibi and Opatica belts, where the Moho is ~5 km deeper than in the Abitibi subprovince and ~8 km deeper than in the northern Opatica subprovince. The gravity model complements the seismic reflection data and provides information on the uppermost supracrustal sequences poorly imaged in the seismic profile. Most of the intrusive rocks in the Opatica Belt appear as thin (<5 km) bodies. Across the Nemiscau and La Grande subprovinces, the Bouguer anomalies are of short wavelengths and their sources lie in the upper crust. The crustal thickness is constant from the northern Opatica Belt throughout the southern part of the Nemiscau subprovince. Density measurements indicate that the upper crustal density is higher in the Nemiscau and La Grande subprovinces than in the Abitibi and Opatica belts. There is some crustal thickening beneath the La Grande subprovince, and a gravity high at the northern end of the subprovince is related to the occurrence of mafic supracrustal sequences. The gravity anomaly signature associated with the lateral density variation and field evidence indicate that the main tectonic boundaries dip to the north.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".