MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963990257 · doi:10.1093/philmat/nkq004

Mathematical Conceptware: Category Theory: RALF KROMER. Tool and Object: A History and Philosophy of Category Theory

2010· article· en· W1963990257 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Pierre Marquis

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophia Mathematica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Field (mathematics)Category theoryPhilosophy of mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldObject (grammar)Algebraic numberAlgebraic geometryMathematicsHomological algebraEpistemologyPure mathematicsMathematics educationComputer scienceFunctorGeometryPhilosophyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Category theory has been used by mathematicians for more than sixty years now. Its importance in algebraic geometry, algebraic topology, and homological algebra is indisputable. Its overall significance in mathematics and the foundations of mathematics is still a matter of debate. An historical analysis of the origins and development of category theory (CT) might shed an interesting light on various issues related to this significance. Ralf Krömer’s book constitutes the first global attempt at such an analysis. It is based on extensive original sources, and it offers an original and challenging perspective. It definitely should be read by historians and philosophers of contemporary mathematics. The book’s main thesis is that a form of pragmatism best describes the implicit philosophy of mathematicians using and developing CT from 1945 to approximately 1970. The thesis is primarily defended by looking at the history of CT, and the latter is organized by following the interactions of CT with three fields: algebraic topology, homological algebra, and algebraic geometry. This does indeed roughly follow the actual development of the field and is thus entirely justified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.011
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophia MathematicaSame topicHistory and Theory of MathematicsFrench-language works237,207