MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964026886 · doi:10.1063/1.3039760

Nature of the pressure-induced collapse of an ice clathrate by dielectric spectroscopy

2008· article· en· W1964026886 on OpenAlexafffund
Ove Andersson, G. P. Johari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsDielectricRelaxation (psychology)TetrahydrofuranChemistryClathrate hydrateDielectric spectroscopyMoleculeSpectroscopyPermittivityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceChemical physicsPhysical chemistryHydrateOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collapse of an ice clathrate of type II structure containing tetrahydrofuran as guest molecules has been studied at different pressures by dielectric spectroscopy. The sample was pressurized to 1.3 GPa at 130 K and the resulting collapsed state was pressure cycled. The dielectric relaxation time increases at a progressively rapid rate during pressurizing and then decreases slowly on depressurizing, but the dielectric relaxation time does not reach the value of the original state. With increase in pressure, the limiting high frequency permittivity due to orientation of H(2)O molecules first increases by about 5% until 0.75 GPa and then decreases slightly until 1 GPa, and finally it increases until approximately 1.2 GPa. The decrease is attributed to the loss of contribution from the reorientational motion of tetrahydrofuran molecules and the increase to densification as the structure mechanically collapses completely in the 1-1.25 GPa range. The relaxation time of the collapsed state is comparable with that of the high-density amorph formed on pressure collapse of ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207