MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964060635 · doi:10.1353/amp.0.0031

The Light That Failed: The History of an Unknown Magazine that Published the Work of a Galaxy of Emerging Stars

2009· article· en· W1964060635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard S. West

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican periodicals · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsideNewspaperArt historyQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryModernism (music)Reading (process)ArtVisual artsLiteratureMedia studiesSociologyLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Light That Failed:The History of an Unknown Magazine that Published the Work of a Galaxy of Emerging Stars Richard Samuel West (bio) During the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the success of lithographic cartoon weeklies led to a revolution in the aesthetics of America's serial reading matter. By the turn of the century, all of the leading magazines were garlanded in colors, from their covers to their advertisements. Newspapers were close behind, festooned with colorful Sunday supplements. The lithographic cartoon weeklies had made such brilliance in print de rigueur. The most famous of these were published in New York: Puck, the first of the genre, and its most prominent imitators, Judge and Truth. But no city of any size during this period was without a lithographic cartoon weekly. Boston had Jingo, Philadelphia had Freaks, New Orleans had Figaro, St. Louis had the Hornet, the Lantern, and the Whip, San Francisco had the Wasp, and Chicago had Light. Aside from the Wasp, which was the most widely read weekly on the West Coast, Light was by far the most important of these forgotten regional magazines because, unlike its brethren, Light provided the first or early employment to a host of talented artists who would later go on to successful careers in design, magazine illustration, cartooning, and animation. Those who contributed to Light included Will H. Bradley, W. W. Denslow, Ferand Lungren, Henry "Hy" Mayer, Peter Newell, T. E. Powers, and Horace Taylor. It also published the works of prominent New York cartoonists, such as Eugene Zimmerman, Emil Flohri, and F. M. Howarth.1 The Year 1889 During its bumpy two-and-a-half year existence, Light's only constant was change: it changed its name, its place of publication, its size [End Page 189] and appearance, and its owners, editors, and chief cartoonists. The magazine began its existence on March 30, 1889, in Columbus, Ohio, as the Owl (Figure 1). Twenty-one year old Opha Moore, a West Virginia native, was serving as Governor Foraker's official stenographer when he conceived of the idea for the magazine, possibly to boost Foraker's chances for a third term. We do not know whether he held both jobs at once, performing his duties as editor of the Owl in secret (no staff names appeared in the magazine until the August 10th issue). Nor do we know who put up the money to finance the magazine, though Moore surely had access to deep Republican pockets across the state. He took as his inspiration the black and white comic weekly Life, then in its prosperous seventh year. The Owl's first issue, priced at a nickel, was unprepossessing: eight pages, with an illustrated cover, an interior made up of poems, jokes, a few cartoons, a comic essay, and a back page of small advertisements. The only star contributor to the issue was A. W. Bellaw, a newspaper editor from nearby Sidney who had a national reputation due to his contributions to the story paper, The Banner Weekly, published by Beadle of New York. He would contribute to the magazine throughout its entire run.2 In the Owl's opening salutation, Moore announced that the weekly would carry the Republican banner. This proved to be true as far as state and city politics were concerned, but in the contrary tradition of the American Midwest the Owl was often at odds with the Republican administration in Washington. Following his declaration of party allegiance, Moore offered a comic list of the Owl's staff, all of whom were Ohio personalities not in the least connected to the magazine. For example, Deacon Richard Smith, owner of the Toledo Commercial, who had gained notoriety that year by threatening to cut Governor Foraker's throat from ear to ear should he be renominated, was designated the Owl's religious editor: "The spiritual condition of our readers will be assiduously cared for by Deacon Richard Smith, of Toledo. His writings are characterized by a bacchanalian gayety, which our readers will soon learn to recognize and love."3 The art department was said to be under the control of the architect responsible for the recently constructed and widely...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican periodicalsSame topicMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingFrench-language works237,207