MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase separation in molecular layers of macromolecules at the champagne–air interface

2004· article· en· W1964083865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microscopy · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacromoleculeBrewster's angleBubbleEllipsometryPhase (matter)Materials scienceLayer (electronics)AmphiphileMicroscopyAir bubbleChemical physicsChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryOpticsThin filmPolymerComposite materialCopolymerOrganic chemistryPhysicsBrewster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bubble and foam stability, which are essential for the hallmark of champagne, rely on the concentration of amphiphilic macromolecules originating from the grape, which form molecular layers at the interface between champagne and gas. Ellipsometry and Brewster angle microscopy experiments were conducted at the air-champagne interface to analyse the lateral organization of the layers of macromolecules. Several kinds of phase separations - leading in some cases to two-dimensional foams - were identified. At the beginning of layer formation, condensed domains develop at the expense of dilute domains. Thereafter, phase separations occur within the condensed domains. These findings may allow advances in the implementation of methods predicting bubble and foam stability of champagnes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it