MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964108556 · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.026201

Time-varying synchronization of chaotic systems in the presence of system mismatch

2004· article· en· W1964108556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Synchronization of chaosControl theory (sociology)Jacobian matrix and determinantConstant (computer programming)Coupling (piping)ChaoticSequence (biology)Square (algebra)Scheme (mathematics)MathematicsComputer scienceChaotic systemsApplied mathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of synchronization of two identical chaotic systems in the presence of system mismatch is investigated in this article. The instantaneous mean square error (E) of the unidirectionally coupled synchronization scheme is analyzed based on the Jacobian equation of the response system. It is shown that synchronization based on a constant coupling parameter does not produce satisfactory performance. A synchronization scheme is proposed here, and the time-varying coupling parameter sequence used in this new scheme is obtained by minimizing the instantaneous E. Numerical simulations show that the proposed time-varying synchronization method has smaller mean square synchronization error than the conventional approach based on using a constant coupling parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it