MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964124420 · doi:10.1002/yea.1585

The <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae CLB5</i> promoter contains two middle sporulation elements (MSEs) that are differentially regulated during sporulation

2008· article· en· W1964124420 on OpenAlexaff
Sheetal A. Raithatha

Bibliographic record

VenueYeast · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSporeGeneticsMicrobiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The B-type cyclins Clb5 and Clb6 are essential activators of DNA replication during sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The expression of CLB5 is maximally induced during the middle phase of sporulation by the transcription factor Ndt80. We have performed an analysis of the CLB5 promoter and have identified two middle sporulation elements (MSEs) that act as binding sites for Ndt80. Although both MSE sequences bind Ndt80 in vitro, they display differential effectiveness in their ability to function as cis-acting regulatory sequences in vivo. Mutation of both MSE sequences in the CLB5 promoter profoundly reduces the induction of CLB5 transcription during the middle phase of sporulation but results in no obvious defect in progression through meiosis and sporulation, implying that the Ndt80-dependent induction of CLB5 is not required for effective DNA replication or chromosome division.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYeastSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207