MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964154481 · doi:10.3171/foc.2004.16.4.13

Growth hormone replacement for patients with adult onset growth hormone deficiency—what have we learned?

2004· review· en· W1964154481 on OpenAlexaff
Monique Piersanti

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgical FOCUS · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsCredit Valley Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrowth hormone deficiencyGrowth hormoneMedicineHormonePathologicalHormone replacement therapy (female-to-male)Intensive care medicinePsychological interventionQuality of life (healthcare)PediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growth hormone (GH) deficiency is a condition recognized to occur in individuals who have had multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies as a result of pathological processes or neurosurgical interventions. The indications, benefits, and risks of GH replacement therapy will be reviewed with an emphasis on those patients who were adults with the deficiency first emerged. The results of this analysis indicate that, although a measurable improvement can be detected in the patient's quality of life, body composition, and some cardiovascular parameters, the larger questions of long-term benefit and patient selection currently remain unanswered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgical FOCUSSame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207