MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964202708 · doi:10.2118/0709-0058-jpt

Technology Focus: Unconventional Resources (July 2009)

2009· article· en· W1964202708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnconventional oilTight gasTight oilCoalbed methaneOil shaleOil sandsPetroleum engineeringPetroleumFossil fuelGeologyDrillingHydraulic fracturingNatural resource economicsMining engineeringEarth scienceEngineeringCoalWaste managementEconomicsArchaeologyPaleontologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technology Focus The baton has been passed, and so, during the next 3 years, I will provide here a brief editorial about and drawing your attention to recent publications or events pertaining to unconventional resources. I have been around the industry since the late 1970s and have seen many changes since. I started my petroleum career working in the unconventional oil sands of Alberta, Canada, which are similar to but colder than those of Venezuela. Although unconventional-oil exploitation is still a dynamic topic, activity in unconventional gas (e.g., tight gas, shale gas, and coalbed methane) is picking up as environmental awareness surrounding the exploitation of unconventional resources grows. So, my editorial is about "unconventionals," a very trendy word indeed. What are unconventional resources and what characterizes them? I will broach this topic in a general way without offering a definition—this has been debated for a long time! There are unconventional locations (e.g., deep water or beneath national parklands, a lake, or a city), which require unconventional methods. There are unconventional formations (e.g., oil sands and coalbed methane) containing hydrocarbons that cannot be produced in a conventional (primary or secondary) way with available equipment, or are not being exploited because of unavailable methods and/or high costs. Unconventional technologies are being developed to recover these unconventional and difficult-to-recover hydrocarbons, from drilling and completions to logging to production. There are unconventional "energies," with a shift toward renewable ones such as wind, solar, geothermal, and deep ocean energies, and biofuels. Obviously, the environment is a priority, and large efforts are expended nowadays in this direction. For example, greenhouse gases are being captured and disposed of in deep rocks or in the water in pilot projects; these gases are also used for enhanced oil recovery. The more-than-century-old "oil and gas" industry has changed into an "energy" industry. As this industry is redefined, many of the technologies that traditionally have been used for oil and gas exploration and development are needed to expand unconventional resources and advance the development of other sources of energy, whether they are nonrenewable or renewable ones. It is natural for this growth of the industry to happen. Along the way, we will find/discover new technologies that will also help the development or redevelopment of the old established sources. Bright is the future! Unconventional Resources additional reading available at OnePetro: www.onepetro.org SPE 119891 • "Workflow for Stratigraphic Characterization of Unconventional Gas Shales" by Roger M. Slatt, SPE, University of Oklahoma, et al. IPTC 12743 • "Importance of Unconventional Oil Resources in Shaping the Far East Energy Future" by Philip Stark, IHS, et al. SPE 113852 • "Oil and Gas Expertise for Geothermal Exploitation: The Need for Technology Transfer" by Gioia Falcone, SPE, Texas A&M University, et al.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it