MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964206802 · doi:10.1142/s0217984901001756

OPTICAL EXTENSION OF DICKE'S SUPERRADIANCE: A CASE STUDY OF THALLIUM IN THALLIUM MERCURY SYSTEM

2001· article· en· W1964206802 on OpenAlex
Shubhada Adhi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters B · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsThalliumSuperradianceMercury (programming language)DephasingPhysicsFull width at half maximumAtomic physicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsChemistryLaserInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A detailed study of superradiance at the Thallium green line (λ=535.0 nm ) in Thallium–Mercury (Tl–Hg) system is reported. High peak power of 1 kW delivered in short pulse duration of 4 nsec (FWHM) has been obtained. Attempts have also been made experimentally to determine the various time constants viz. inhomogeneous dephasing time, decay time, characteristic time, delay time etc. along with their inequality relations for the Tl–Hg system. The experimental results of superradiance in Tl are compared with those predicted theoretically by M. S. Feld et al. 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it