MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental Study of Surcharged Flow at Combining Sewer Junctions

2006· article· en· W1964225447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsBody orificeOpen-channel flowPipe flowOrifice plateInletMomentum (technical analysis)Flow conditioningFlow conditionsIsothermal flowPhysicsGeologyEngineeringTurbulenceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of a laboratory investigation on surcharged flow in combining sewer junctions are presented in this paper. Experiments were conducted in a 90° model junction and the 25.8° Edworthy model junction. The study confirmed the existence of three flow regimes in sewer junctions with a steep outgoing pipe: Regime I denotes the open-channel flow through the junction chamber; Regime II flow is partially surcharged flow featured by orifice flow into the outlet pipe; and Regime III flow is fully surcharged flow with all connecting pipes running full. The transition flow from Regimes II to III was investigated, and it may be related to the inlet waves at the entrance of the outlet pipe. Criteria for the transition were provided. Theoretical analyses were conducted based on one-dimensional momentum equation. The derived equations are able to estimate the water depth in the junction chamber. Energy loss in Regime III flow was studied and predictions based on the momentum equation were evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it