Climat familial et réseau d'amis chez les adolescentes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Cette étude examine la relation entre le climat conjugal, le climat parental et l’orientation vers les pairs à l’adolescence. Quarante et un couples et leur adolescente acceptent de répondre à des questionnaires et de réaliser des discussions filmées. Les questionnaires et les systèmes d’observation évaluent le climat conjugal, le climat parental, le nombre d’amis, le temps passé avec les amis et la mobilisation de soutien des amis. Les résultats montrent que plus le climat parental est négatif, plus les adolescentes sont orientées vers leurs amis. Après avoir contrôlé l’association entre le climat parental et l’orientation vers les amis, le climat conjugal explique une part unique de la variabilité de l’orientation vers les amis. Cette étude suggère que, dans certaines conditions, des adolescentes développent des stratégies compensatoires d’adaptation face aux possibles carences familiales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".