MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964229401 · doi:10.3917/enf.562.0187

Climat familial et réseau d'amis chez les adolescentes

2004· article· fr· W1964229401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfance · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<titre>R&#201;SUM&#201;</titre> Cette &#233;tude examine la relation entre le climat conjugal, le climat parental et l&#8217;orientation vers les pairs &#224; l&#8217;adolescence. Quarante et un couples et leur adolescente acceptent de r&#233;pondre &#224; des questionnaires et de r&#233;aliser des discussions film&#233;es. Les questionnaires et les syst&#232;mes d&#8217;observation &#233;valuent le climat conjugal, le climat parental, le nombre d&#8217;amis, le temps pass&#233; avec les amis et la mobilisation de soutien des amis. Les r&#233;sultats montrent que plus le climat parental est n&#233;gatif, plus les adolescentes sont orient&#233;es vers leurs amis. Apr&#232;s avoir contr&#244;l&#233; l&#8217;association entre le climat parental et l&#8217;orientation vers les amis, le climat conjugal explique une part unique de la variabilit&#233; de l&#8217;orientation vers les amis. Cette &#233;tude sugg&#232;re que, dans certaines conditions, des adolescentes d&#233;veloppent des strat&#233;gies compensatoires d&#8217;adaptation face aux possibles carences familiales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it