MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1964245059 · doi:10.1139/p07-071

Nonseparability of continuously measured quantum systems in the classical limit

2007· article· en· W1964245059 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shohini Ghose, Barry C. Sanders, Paul M. Alsing, Ivan Deutsch

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsClassical limitLimit (mathematics)QuantumQuantum chaosQuantum entanglementChaoticQuantum systemStatistical physicsQuantum limitPosition (finance)Work (physics)Quantum mechanicsClassical mechanicsQuantum dynamicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the question of separability in a continuously measured quantum system as it approaches the classical limit. We show that the record of position measurements can approach the classical limit even when the system is described by highly nonseparable states. In particular, in systems with a chaotic classical limit, chaos can work to enhance the entanglement in the system in the classical regime. This coexistence of nonclassical states and classical dynamics can be understood by analyzing the conditioned evolution of the measured system and the conditions for the quantum-to-classical transition. PACS Nos.: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud, 03.67.Mn, 05.45.Mt, 03.67.–a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicQuantum Information and Cryptography→French-language works237,207→