MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964245767 · doi:10.1139/v00-077

On diastereomeric perturbations

2000· article· en· W1964245767 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christian Girard, Henri B. Kagan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsChemistryEnantiomerDiastereomerChirality (physics)MoleculeReagentNatural productOrganic chemistryCombinatorial chemistryEnantioselective synthesisEnantiomeric excessBiochemical engineeringComputational chemistryCatalysisChiral symmetry breakingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For more than a century, organic chemists have been playing in Nature's laboratory. Their first goal was to understand the organization of atoms in the living matter and then to reproduce it by synthesis. This quest gave rise to several efficient techniques to synthesise molecules; many of them still in use nowadays, as such or with little modifications. Even at the beginning of this journey, the chemists discovered that their methods were far from being as efficient as the ones used by Nature to produce substances. The natural molecules were chiral and there was even an enantiomer that was produced over the other;a lesson of perfection. This was another challenge for the chemists and they succeeded by first developing techniques to separate enantiomers and more recently reagents and reactions to produce only the desired stereoisomer. Asymmetric synthesis uses chiral auxiliaries, reagents or catalysts to create chirality into the desired compound. The common perception, as a minimum condition, was that the chiral substance used to perform such a transformation has to be of the highest enantiomeric purity to obtain a very high selectivity. The relation between the enantiomeric excesses of the chiral substance and the product was suggested to be linear. But there were a lot of surprises left in the laboratory. Who would have thought that an impure substance could give an enantiomeric excess in the product higher than its own purity? The molecules are acting in different ways in solution. Self-organization and aggregation can arise depending on the structure of the substance or its environment. Such phenomenon can generate deviations to the awaited behaviour of the molecules that can be observed in many cases. This article tries to present some examples of the historical reports of such peculiar behaviours, their influence on physico-chemical properties and the final discovery of the now well-known nonlinear effects in asymmetric synthesis.Key words: asymmetric synthesis, diastereomeric interactions, nonlinear effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrigins and Evolution of LifeFrench-language works237,207