MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964250508 · doi:10.1039/b207735n

Structure–property trends in π-stacked dithiazolo-dithiazolyl conductors

2002· article· en· W1964250508 on OpenAlexaff
L. Beer, Jaclyn L. Brusso, A. W. Cordes, Erika Godde, Robert C. Haddon, Mikhail E. Itkis, Richard T. Oakley, Robert W. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProperty (philosophy)Electrical conductorMaterials scienceNanotechnologyComposite materialPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The resonance stabilized dithiazolo-dithiazolyl radical 1b adopts a slipped π-stack structure exhibiting weak 1-D ferromagnetic coupling; variable temperature conductivity measurements indicate σRT = 2 × 10−6 S cm−1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicOrganic and Molecular Conductors ResearchFrench-language works237,207