MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964266429 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450780429

Formation of needle‐like lepidocrocite fine particles by oxidation of an aqueous suspension of ferrous hydroxide in a bubble column

2000· article· en· W1964266429 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hae‐Man Cho, Hiroyuki Kawasaki, Hidehiro Kumazawa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicIron oxide chemistry and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLepidocrociteFerrousAqueous solutionChemistrySodium hydroxideOxygenHydroxideParticle sizeBubbleParticle (ecology)Inorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyOrganic chemistryGoethiteGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fine particles of needle‐like lepidocrocite (γ‐FeOOH) were synthesized by the oxidation of aqueous suspensions of ferrous hydroxide using a bubble column with draft tube at a constant temperature ranging from 20°C to 30°C. The oxidation steps leading to green rust (an intermediate) and lepidocrocite (final product), termed Step I and II, respectively, could be described apparently as first order, with respect to oxygen, and zero order, with respect to total ferrous species. When the concentration of oxygen in the feed stream was varied under a constant gas velocity, the mean size based on the major axis of needle‐like particle decreased from 0.60 to 0.35 μm with increasing oxidation rate. When the gas velocity was varied under a constant oxygen concentration, the particle size was almost independent of the oxidation rate and was equal to ca. 0.6 μm. By the addition of a small amount of sodium dihydrogenphosphate (NaH 2 PO 4 ), the major axis could be reduced to 0.2 μm with the minor axis and the oxidation rate almost unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicIron oxide chemistry and applicationsFrench-language works237,207