MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964272211 · doi:10.1002/iub.1058

Binding of phosphatidic acid to 14‐3‐3 proteins hampers their ability to activate the plant plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>‐ATPase

2012· article· en· W1964272211 on OpenAlex
Lorenzo Camoni, Cristina Di Lucente, Roberta Pallucca, Sabina Visconti, Patrizia Aducci

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
FundersRegione LazioAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsPhosphatidic acidMastoparanBiochemistryPhospholipase DSecond messenger systemChemistryCell biologyPhospholipidATPaseBiologyMembraneEnzymeSignal transductionG protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphatidic acid is a phospholipid second messenger implicated in various cellular processes in eukaryotes. In plants, production of phosphatidic acid is triggered in response to a number of biotic and abiotic stresses. Here, we show that phosphatidic acid binds to 14-3-3 proteins, a family of regulatory proteins which bind client proteins in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Binding of phosphatidic acid involves the same 14-3-3 region engaged in protein target binding. Consequently, micromolar phosphatidic acid concentrations significantly hamper the interaction of 14-3-3 proteins with the plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase, a well characterized plant 14-3-3 target, thus inhibiting the phosphohydrolitic enzyme activity. Moreover, the proton pump is inhibited when endogenous PA production is triggered by phospholipase D and the G protein agonist mastoparan-7. Hence, our data propose a possible mechanism involving PA that regulates 14-3-3-mediated cellular processes in response to stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it