MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964275021 · doi:10.7202/001714ar

Le moi et Dieu selon Maître Eckhart

2009· article· fr· W1964275021 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olivier Boulnois

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAugustinian Studies and Theology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophySermonHumanitiesArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Sermon 52 d’Eckhart se situe au croisement de l’aristotélisme et de l’augustinisme : l’homme accède à la béatitude par la contemplation, il a pour modèle la divinisation du chrétien. Pour Eckhart, seul le détachement permet à l’homme d’y accéder, par un triple renoncement : à la concupiscence de la chair, à la convoitise du savoir et au désir de dominer. Dans ce détachement, devient-il un ça, un intellect abstrait, impersonnel? Cesse-t-il d’être un moi? Apparemment, puisque Dieu seul peut dire « moi », selon Eckhart. Mais en réalité, pas du tout, car le sermon a été prononcé pour la fête de tous les saints, unis à Dieu sur le modèle du Fils avec son Père : une seule essence, mais deux personnes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiquesSame topicAugustinian Studies and TheologyFrench-language works237,207