MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of vision on the development of topographical orientation abilities

2006· article· en· W1964296730 on OpenAlexaff
Madeleine Fortin, Patrice Voss, Constant Rainville, Maryse Lassonde, Franco Leporé

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental rotationOrientation (vector space)PsychologyTask (project management)Spatial abilityCognitive psychologyCommunicationAudiologyNeuroscienceCognitionMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current experiment examined the importance of visual input on the construction of inner spatial representations. Early and late-onset blind and paired control participants performed a tactile spatial orientation task. No significant group differences were observed, indicating that the blind can represent space. More errors, however, were committed by the early blind than by the late blind and sighted individuals in portions of the task that involved mental rotation skills, suggesting a potential facilitating role for vision in the proper development of spatial constructs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207