MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964306033 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2013.2283463

L -infinity norm design of linear-phase robust broadband beamformers using constrained optimization

2013· article· en· W1964306033 on OpenAlexafffund
R. C. Nongpiur, D.J. Shpak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPassbandStopbandControl theory (sociology)Linear phaseMathematicsConvex optimizationAttenuationSensitivity (control systems)Optimization problemMicrophoneComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Band-pass filterAlgorithmPhysicsTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringSound pressureEngineeringRegular polygonOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for the design of linear-phase robust far-field broadband beamformers using constrained optimization is proposed. In the method, the maximum passband ripple and minimum stopband attenuation are ensured to be within prescribed levels, while at the same time maintaining a good linear-phase characteristic at a prescribed group delay in the passband. Since the beamformer is intended primarily for small-sized microphone arrays where the microphone spacing is small relative to the wavelength at low frequencies, the beamformer can become highly sensitive to spatial white noise and array imperfections if a direct minimization of the error is performed. Therefore, to limit the sensitivity of the beamformer the optimization is carried out by constraining a sensitivity parameter, namely, the white noise gain (WNG) to be above prescribed levels across the frequency band. Two novel design variants have been developed. The first variant is formulated as a convex optimization problem where the maximum error in the passband is minimized, while the second variant is formulated as an iterative optimization problem and has the advantage of significantly improving the linear-phase characteristics of the beamformer under any prescribed group delay or linear-array configuration. In the second variant, the passband group-delay deviation is minimized while ensuring that the maximum passband ripple and stopband attenuation are within prescribed levels. To reduce the computational effort in carrying out the optimization, a nonuniform variable sampling approach over the frequency and angular dimensions is used to compute the required parameters. Experiment results show that beamformers designed using the proposed methods have much smaller passband group-delay deviation for similar passband ripple and stopband attenuation than a modified version of an existing method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207