MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964314939 · doi:10.1115/imece2012-86427

Simulation of Blank Design for Blades of Francis Turbines

2012· article· en· W1964314939 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhengkun Feng, Henri Champliaud, Michel Sabourin, Sebastien Morin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Canadian institutionsAlstom (Canada)Cégep de Sorel-TracyUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBlankFrancis turbineBlade (archaeology)Mechanical engineeringFinite element methodPressingMachiningProcess (computing)Turbine bladeHydropowerHydraulic turbinesEngineeringTurbineEngineering drawingStructural engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The metal pressing process which is widely used in many industries has advantages over casting process for producing large and thick blades of Francis turbine. For the design of pressing process, blank design should be firstly performed to determine the dimension of the flat blank. In fact, the traditional trial and error approach is not applicable for the blade design for Francis turbines that is not standard because of the different hydraulic characteristics of a hydropower plant from site to site. The powerful computing technology makes it possible to desgn optimum blanks by numerical modeling and simulation. In this paper, the multi-step inverse finite element approach is investigated for blank design and an elasto-plastic model has been built by using the well-known software ANSYS. Unfolding tests with cylindrical sections have been carried out and the numerical results agree well with the analytical results. Thereafter, a large and thick blade of Francis turbine for hydropower plants has been successfully unfolded by the FE model. Finally, for ensuring the machining of the blade after the pressing process, a new contour is obtained by extending the boundary of the flat blank provided by the FE model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCavitation Phenomena in PumpsFrench-language works237,207