MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964401556 · doi:10.1137/110833543

The Linearized Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Dantzig Selector

2012· article· en· W1964401556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsApplied mathematicsSelection (genetic algorithm)Mathematical optimizationVariable (mathematics)AlgorithmMathematical analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dantzig selector was recently proposed to perform variable selection and model fitting in the linear regression model. It can be solved numerically by the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADM); and in this paper, we show that the application of ADM to the Dantzig selector can be speeded up significantly if one of its resulting subproblems at each iteration is linearized. The resulting linearized ADM for the Dantzig selector is shown to be efficient for solving both synthetic and real world data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it