MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964403247 · doi:10.1109/bwcca.2013.29

ACK with Interference Detection Technique for ZigBee Network under Wi-Fi Interference

2013· article· en· W1964403247 on OpenAlexaff
Zhipeng Wang, Tianyu Du, Yong Tang, Dimitrios Makrakis, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkRetransmissionComputer scienceTestbedNetwork packetNeuRFonWireless sensor networkAcknowledgementInterference (communication)WirelessWireless networkChannel (broadcasting)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have shown that the low-power ZigBee based wireless sensor networks (WSN) are vulnerable to the interference of Wi-Fi wireless local area networks (WLAN). From our experimental studies on this coexistence issue, it is found that there are a large number of acknowledgement (ACK) packet losses in the ZigBee packet transmission process, which, in turn, generates large number of unnecessary packet retransmissions, wasting precious channel bandwidth and energy. To address this issue, in this paper, a novel technique named ACK with Interference Detection (ACK-ID) that can effectively reduce the ACK losses and consequently reduce ZigBee packet retransmissions is proposed and implemented in the Crossbow MICAz motes of our testbed. The experimental performance evaluation results show that the proposed ACK-ID can significantly improve the performance of ZigBee packet transmission in terms of ACK delivery rate and packet retransmission rate while operating under interference from the collocated WLAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207