MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964445734 · doi:10.1177/1077546304042049

Multibody Dynamics and Nonlinear Control of Flexible Space Structures

2004· article· en· W1964445734 on OpenAlex
Afzal Suleman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemMultibody systemFlexibility (engineering)SpacecraftLinearizationFeedback linearizationControl engineeringController (irrigation)Equations of motionDynamics (music)Nonlinear controlComputer scienceSystem dynamicsEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsPhysicsAerospace engineeringClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multibody dynamics formulation for studying the response of large space structures with interconnected flexible bodies is presented. The use of system modes to model the structural flexibility results in a compact form of the nonlinear equations of motion. Next, the nonlinear control based feedback linearization technique is applied to effectively control the attitude motion of a flexible space platform. Using the original nonlinear dynamics of the multibody system, the controller determines the effort to effectively linearize the system and introduces a linear compensator to achieve the desired output in the presence of structural flexibility of the spacecraft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it