Origin of spin-ice behavior in Ising pyrochlore magnets with long-range dipole interactions: an insight from mean-field theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent experiments suggest that the Ising pyrochlore magnets Ho 2 Ti 2 O 7 and Dy 2 Ti 2 O 7 display qualitative properties of the ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor spin-ice model proposed by Harris et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2554 (1997). The manifestation of spin-ice behavior in these systems despite the energetic constraints introduced by the strength and the long-range nature of dipoledipole interactions, remains difficult to understand. We report here results from a mean-field analysis that shed some light on the origin of spin-ice behavior in (111) Ising pyrochlores. Specifically, we find that there exist a large frustrating effect of the dipolar interactions beyond the nearest neighbor, and that the degeneracy established by effective ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor interactions is only very weakly lifted by the long-range interactions. Such behavior only appears beyond a cut-off distance corresponding to O(10 2 ) nearest neighbor. Our mean-field analysis shows that truncation of dipolar interactions leads to spurious ordering phenomena that change with the truncation cut-off distance. PACS Nos.: 75.10-b, 75.10Hk, 75.20-g, 75.30-m
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".